Symposium Forensic Commitment, Reasonableness * Responsibility * Human Rights

Bernd-Christian Funk
Institute for Public and Administrative Law
Katharina Rueprecht
Elisabeth Kammerlander
Victims‘ Mission Charity Society
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Human Rights
INVITATION
to the Symposium
Forensic Commitment
Reasonableness * Responsibility * Human Rights

on Wednesday,
20 November 2013
at
9:00
Juridicum, top floor
Universität Wien
Rechtswissenschaftliche Fakultät

1010 Wien, Schottenbastei 10-16
Austria/Europe
Conference Language is German
Program
9:00 – 9:10:
welcome address
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Manfred NOWAK
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Bernd-Christian FUNK
Model and Reality
9:10 – 9:30:
Life-long Confinement for a Personality Disorder?
Committing Mentally Abnormal Offenders as a Factical Preventative Detention
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Alois BIRKLBAUER, Head of the Dept. of Practice of Poenology and Medical Criminal Law of the Johannes Kepler Universität Linz
9:30 –9:40:
Discussion
9:40–10:00:
Conditional Institutionalisation – a Forgotten Option?
Dr. Astrid WAGNER, Rechtsanwältin
10:00 –10:10 :
Discussion
10:10 – 10:30 :
Probation as a Procedure – as It Ought Be and as It Is
Dr. Katharina RUEPRECHT, em. attorney
10:30 – 10:40 :
Discussion
Coffee break
11:00 – 11:20 :
Probation Procedure under the Aspect of Fundamental Rights
em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Bernd-Christian FUNK, Universität Wien, Universität Linz
11:20 – 11:30 :
Discussion
Reasonableness and Ideas
11:30 – 11:50 :
Forensic Commitment under the Aspect of Human Rights
Univ. – Prof. Dr. Manfred NOWAK, Professor for International Law and Human Rights at Universität Wien, Co-Director of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Human Rights, head of a Besuchskommission of the People’s Attorneyship, former UN special reporter on torture
11:50 – 12:00 :
Discussion
12:00 – 12:20 :
On the Archaeology of Forensic Commitment, § 21 Abs. 2 StGB – The Healing Power of State Authority
DSA Albert HOLZBAUER, Social worker, Lecturer at the Fachhochschule Linz, Dept. of Health and Social Affairs
12:20 – 12:30 :
Discussion
Lunch
1:30 – 1:50 :
Sense and Senselessness of Punishment and Measures
DDDr. Franz LANGMAYR, em. attorney
1:50 – 2:00 :
Discussion
Country Comparison
2:00 – 2:20 :
A Glance Outward: What Can Forensic Commitment Learn from a Look over Country Borders?
Prof. Dr. med. Norbert NEDOPIL, Forensic Psychiatry,
Psychiatr. Clinic & Polyclinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
2:20 – 2:30 :
Discussion
Certification
2:30 – 2:50 :
The Regulation and Work of Expert Witnesses
Prof. Dr. Nikolaus LEHNER, em. attorney
2:50 – 13:00 :
Discussion
3:00 – 3:20 :
Transparency and the Justification of Psychiatric Certification in Austria – from an Attorney’s Perspective
Dr. Helmut SCHOTT, attorney
3:20 – 3:30 :
Discussion
coffee break
4:00 – 4:20 :
The Sound of Science: Sources of Diagnostic Error in Forensic Psychological Certification in Austria –
Mag. Dr. rer. nat. Klaus BURTSCHER,
Clinical neuropsychologist, court appointed expert witness, forensic psychologist
4:20 – 4:30 :
Discussion
Forced Therapy
4:30 – 4:50 :
Forced Therapy in Forensic Commitment: What Is It, Why Does It Exist, How Is It Managed and Who Is at the Receiving End? And What if It Did Not Exist?
Dr. Patrick FROTTIER, Medical Specialist for Psychiatry and
Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Child – and Juvenile Psychiatrist, head of the Conciliar Liaison Service for Children and Youth in Danger of Crisis at Vienna Psychosocial Services
4:50 –5:00 :
Discussion
5:00 – 6:00 :
Closing discussion
Moderation: Elisabeth KAMMERLANDER and Katharina RUEPRECHT
Organisation:
Verein VICTIMS MISSION
Independent * non-denominational * non-party
ZVR – no.: 731091641
www.victimsmission.com
registration
at:
elisabeth.kammerlander

Forensic commitment is one of the most mysterious, constitutionally most unclear and politically most often ignored topics of the Republic. (People’s attorney Terezija Stoisits) The public usually only hears that someone is committed to an “institution for mentally abnormal offenders”. What the public does not find out, however, is that these special institutions are overfilled and that these persons are consequently put into normal poenal institutions, where hardly any psychological help at all is offered, but often (forced) “sedation”. The period of forensic commitment is not limited. Furthermore, the number of forensic commitments increases constantly. The end of a forensic commitment is left to court discretion. The criminal proceedings are explicitly legally bound to poenal law, but in practice they are quite different.
“They beat me severely, pinned me to the floor and then gave me the shots. Dapotum Depot 200 mg. Every fourteen days.“
“And then they beat you again and pinned you to the floor?”
“No. Not after that. Then they only threatened to. Then I no longer resisted.”
From the book: Staatsgewalt. Die Schattenseiten des Rechtsstaates
by Katharina Rueprecht and Bernd-Christian Funk

About Venite Austria

“music is not only to be listened – music it is able to connect people” Venite-austria wants to realise music-social compositons for special projects and will document them.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s